Often one hears a statement similar to this: "Train skills; do not train stats." The implication or sometimes direct statement is that you will be sorry if you train stats, especially certain stats. The Consortium opinion is that, in the majority of circumstances, it is perfectly all right to train stats, and in some cases it is better to train stats. (This process of training stats is often called "burning.") The purpose of this article is to explore stat and skill training and to and to give the reader some ideas as to if, or when, stat training is either a-okay or best. The article will also explore when it is considered best not to train stats.
First, to set the stage, there are several principles, givens, and ideas that the reader must understand.
With those principles in mind, one can postulate certain scenarios which might provide a basis for decision-making as to "what to train." These represent, first, the knowledge necessary, then, The Consortium scenarios for training decision, STATs or SKILLs?
KNOWLEDGE
CONSORTIUM DECISION MODEL
Perhaps a couple of Consortium examples are in order. Let's consider these two warriors" 14-7-12-15-20-14-11 striker and 4-10-11-17-17-4-21 aimed-blow.
Although a solid warrior, the striker would be considered NRM, especially since strikers are not considered likely Primus-level styles. The warrior probably rolled good damage and good endurance. The odds of getting a first stat raise are near 100% (5%x20, but everything has a "luck" roll). The warrior at 15WT should expect to earn nearly two skills per turn (Consortium rates 15WT skill learn rate at 1.75ish) Consortium Managers would plan two immediate "bumps"--WL to 21 and ST to 15. Moving to 21 WL gains seven fine skills (2 each Att, Par, Def and 1 Decise) and enhances physicals a tiny bit. (Adds 0.4 hit points and improves endurance a small amount) Training skills would have yielded a probability of two skills, and three if lucky. The choice to train WL is a no-brainer. The 2nd plan train to 15ST is also a good one. At 15 ST, two skills are earned, attack and parry. The 15ST also enhances weapon selection, making the striker now strong enough to carry certain "larger weapons" with no penalty. (The battle axe is an often favored weapon of Consortiumites--and probably should be a favorite of yours.) The 15ST also has the possibility of raising the warrior's damage rating from good to great. Consortium places this damage bump odds at 4-1, appx 20% likely. Compared to the probability of learning 2 skills (or an unlucky 1 or a lucky 3) the 15ST raise seems like a good one. There are no more planned raises for this warrior, but that does not preclude that a Consortium manager might not later attempt an additional ST raise to 16 (if great damage was not attained) and a raise to 8 CN, especially if the warrior has a "frail" rating.
Warrior #2, the aimer is rated a GOD. There would be no planned stat raises to the warrior, training skill all the way until maxed. However, there would be no reason not to consider CN raises, as no CN raise burns skills and every aimer can use additional hit points. This choice would need to be balanced against the probability of earning 2.25 skills per turn (Consortium rating). One additional consideration should be given. If this warrior rolled "little damage", (normal damage is more likely) the bump to 5ST could be what is needed to get normal damage. The raising of that stat "burns" a parry and an attack skill, however. For a long-term warrior, especially an aimer which can use little-damage somewhat effectively, this bump would not be recommended.
In conclusion, there is no absolute when it comes to training skills or stats. Training stats is not a no-no. Burning skills can be inconsequential. Physical and skill gains from stats can greatly enhance the warrior and the W/L record. But, like most other decisions in D2, there is a trade-off. Burning stats on a long-term, ADM+ warrior could prove damaging to the warrior's long-term health. Choose wisely rather than automatically.
-- Agent Smith, Everly Brothers, Consortium Affiliate